Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | BHSPitMonkey's commentslogin

By that logic, why even spend effort migrating from a known-working implementation to one which is known to have outstanding bugs that there isn't enough bandwidth to fix?

Hard to say, but there are legitimate reasons. One of which being they think Rust is growing while C is a shrinking language. Other could be safety (yes, yes the audit did surface bugs). Or even that having a single lib work seamlessly on Windows/Linux/MacOS/Redux/Web.

Fashion.

A few excerpts from https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html worth a careful re-read:

> In Comments

> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.

> Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.

> When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3."


Why are you replying on this comment?

As near as I can tell, I was in fact right. I just didn't follow the laws of HN communication to express it, on a thread where the person I replied to didn't follow it either.

It would have been more appropriate to pile on with the others above.


Would mandating the use of CO2 as a refrigerant also somehow economically motivate efforts to capture more CO2 out of the atmosphere, in a kind of virtuous cycle? Or would there be a Cobra Effect in there somewhere? I'm not familiar with the industries that refine and bottle the stuff.

No, neither - the amount of CO2 that'd be needed for use as a refrigerant is insignificant. There's already a lot of CO2 produced as a byproduct of industrial chemical processes like petroleum refining. Some of it is captured for reuse (e.g. in drink carbonation); most of it is released to the atmosphere.

Of course, if too many people heed this advice there won't _be_ a second version to wait for.

Yes, but you have to admit that the existence of these SLDs (like co.uk) is always going to be a point of confusion for anyone with a basic knowledge of how the domain hierarchy _usually_ works.

Needing to be familiar with all the special cases (like the VERY special case of x.y.name which I previously knew nothing about) kind of ruins everything and introduces yet more security risk.


> but you have to admit that the existence of these SLDs (like co.uk)

I'm sorry, what ? Admit ? Confusion ?

In the case of .co.uk it has been around since 1996. HN is a technical forum, most people here should be well aware it is a serious SLD. I honestly can't believe it even needs clarifying.

Hell, if you use AWS Route 53 you'll see they use co.uk as one of their nameserver suffixes[1].

[1] https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/SO...


I'm not referring to the HN audience; I mean the larger evergreen cohort of people in the world who are still building their mental model of how the web works. They will each eventually be doomed to the same misconceptions because it's a system full of inconsistencies and special cases.


But Matter _is_ locally-controlled. Matter-over-Thread is better as there's no side channels to abuse; Matter-over-Wifi also guarantees local control though the presence of Wifi means a high probability of some additional onboard software bloat the manufacturer can use to enshittify the product if you're not careful.


There's always sunrise


Yeah sunrise, when the lawn is soaking wet with dew.


Under-represent relative to what, exactly?


Can't express redhead for example. Redhead being not the hair tone, but the translucency of skin that gives the look.


Translucency is not a property of colour itself.


I just think it's highly amusing (in the absurd sense) that you consider a visual artist to be a political ideologue simply for applying color theory to render realistic characters in their art.


Why? A dual-hose portable is more efficient than a single-hose, but a PTAC should (in theory) be more efficient (and possibly quieter) on account of having the heat-emitting side of the cooling loop outside of the living space, which is closer to the ideal split system - though I suppose that advantage could be undermined by the unit's age and condition.


Single-hose is always awful. It can't be other-than-awful.

All of the air that gets pushed out of that singular exhaust hose gets replaced by hot (and often very humid) outside air -- the same stuff we're burning electricity to fight a war against. (It is my considered opinion that single-hose portable aircons should not exist, and I'd remove them from the Earth if I had the ability.)

Dual-hose units can work OK.

They have some advantages, too, like being portable (they can be placed in the space that most-needs cooling instead of the space where they're mounted hard into a wall), or being quiet[er].

I've never experienced a PTAC in an NYC apartment, but some of the ones I've used in hotel rooms have been monstrously-noisy. I would never want to live with one of the noisy ones.


Well considering those units have an EER rating of 10-11, my comment stands. The midea duo has a SEER of 14.7. 1200 watts vs 816 watts.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: