Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | JaceLightning's commentslogin

> doesn't make sense for ICE to behave like some unaccountable secret police that hires the biggest assholes they can find who can then do whatever they want

ICE is run by the same people today as it was under Obama. No one had a problem with Deporter-in-Chief Obama. Any notion that ICE is "some unaccountable secret police" is unsubstantiated nonsense.


Could you make the same argument about in person chats out loud?

If so, then they better record everything their employees say!


Justwatch.com


Thank.

God.

Fuck evil Apple.


That's the stupidest article ever. "Let's destroy our planets and kill all the animals because it might lead to better science maybe"


Would be nice to play on mobile


I have added some buttons so you can play on mobile.


Please suppress "user-select" through CSS ao that rapid button tapping won't cause parts of the screen to be selected.


Try now.


He tried to patent.... the store... the digital store...


Seems like the idea's been around a while https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/App_store


Title is misleading. Has nothing to do with union protections.

Sounds like a strong case. Why should companies be forced to employ people who actively work to harm the reputation of said company?


> Has nothing to do with union protections.

Preventing employer retaliation for discussing the conditions of employment are a pretty significant part of the protections around unions. An open letter discussing the conduct of the CEO falls under discussion of the conditions of employment.

There are limits to what companies can do to try and prevent unions from forming. SpaceX is claiming that those restrictions and the way in which they're enforced by the NLRB are unconstitutional. Seems pretty fair to characterize that as something which would bust up some federal union protections.


Some people think it's ok for employers to be mini-dictators. Most people, for example those who need to work for a living, do not.

But however you slice it, is is absolutely one-hundred percent a labor rights issue.


You're right about the outcome SpaceX is seeking. But the critical thing you're missing is the argument they are making against NLRB. The legal arguments aren't really about the specific facts of the case but, rather, about constitutional issues that go to the heart of how NLRB adjudicates labor disputes. From the article:

> It claims the NLRB’s proceedings, which involve a hearing in front of an NLRB administrative law judge (ALJ), violate SpaceX’s “constitutional right to trial by jury.” The company also accuses NLRB of violating the Constitution’s rules on the separation of powers, stating the agency’s structure “is miles away from the traditional understanding” of the concept.


> Why should companies be forced to employ people who actively work to harm the reputation of said company?

The irony being that the content of the letter is in regards to Elon Musk's work to actively harm the reputation of said company. By this token, why should employees be forced to work under petulant, capricious, myopic executives who undermine the efforts of the people with boots on the ground who do all the actual work?


Oh that's easy. *They aren't*

An employee has one job: to help their employer make money. That's it.

If they aren't doing their job (by harming the reputation of their employer), then they shouldn't be employed.


Nobody forced them to work there.


Because unlike what “Fountainhead” by Ayn Rand says, checks and balances on positions of power is usually a socially good thing.


No lol we won't have fully self driving cars in our lifetime. We would need cars to fully understand human speech and understanding and be able to react with 100% accuracy 100x faster than humans.

Possible? Yes, but not for decades to come.


You know, they use food prices to calculate inflation...


They also use fuel, rent, and a bunch of other things. So I think it's valid to compare the two.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: