100km is the height where meteoroids ablate. You must mean 100k miles and even there the largest meteors start to become visible.

Indeed at the bottom tfb quotes heights of 190-250km for model calculations.

No, they are just grumpy.

Later on he cites an Anil Seth paper that makes the same unproven suggestion of substrate dependence of consciousness.

I assume some of the solutions are stable against small perturbations, while others are not. That would be interesting to see.

If you go to the individual solutions, the text description tells you if it's stable. There's also a slider that allows you to perturb the orbit so you can see for yourself when you perturb it.

I think that's what "STABLE ONLY" clickable text filters by.

Could it be the reboot thing is legacy code from Windows 1.0? Wait, then Gates himself was at th wheel.

It feels unnatural that a white bishop can move to black squares.

See https://www.quantamagazine.org/theory-of-fluids-enters-the-2... if you want to know what the Navier Stokes equations are about.

Strange to start with a clause that is irrelevant to the rest of the page.

I'm curious why you think a disclaimer about the accuracy of predicting the future is irrelevant to a timeline of predictions about the far future. Indeterminacy and free will can absolutely affect most of the predictions listed on this timeline.

I found the mention peculiar, free will and all, really did.-

Decrypt later, I suppose.

Ouch, that was indeed a typo...

In addition, there also is the issue of tick borne encephalitis: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tick-borne_encephalitis