Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | MisterTea's commentslogin

Who's selling dumb TV's again, Samsung? Who else? I'll happily pay a thousand bucks to not get screwed by my TV.

What you want to look for is called "Commercial Signage Display". These are basically large "TV" monitors that are sold to businesses like sports bars.

On Amazon, you can find a few here: https://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/industrial/18746933011... (which are mostly Samsung).


I used to go on here about Sceptre TVs, because they are relatively cheap and dumb as a brick. Was just shopping for one because of this LG news (wanted to replace my old one from 2014), and while Sceptre still lists them on their website, they tell me to go to Amazon or Walmart to buy one.

Amazon and Walmart say they are out of stock, with no expected date.

My conclusion is that Sceptre, the last holdout in the dumb TV industry, has quit in favor of focusing on monitors/displays for computers. Now I'm not sure if I'm going to ever replace my TV!


In Germany I like the "OK" brand from Saturn/Mediamarkt. They're Ok.

The dumb models are very cheap and the picture is faithful due to lack of framerate-doubler and other picture-enhancement shenanigans.


Don’t you worry, mid/high end TVs cost thousands of bucks and have all the same spyware

panelook.com

The thing which depresses me the most is all these so-called smart TV's are giant Arm computers that run malicious software. Imagine if we could re-flash your TV with Linux or whatever.

I can imagine that. We'd have a slow SBC with a fast video decoder, a huge screen that is inseparable and also now uncalibrated, some video inputs for other things, maybe a tuner if anyone can figure it out, and some kind of network connectivity.

I could probably come up with a use for that, but it's about as likely as coming up with a plan for one of the Raspberry Pi Zero Ws that are sitting in the drawer.


I feel like all the closed model providers are milking it as they likely know open models on local hardware will one day eat their lunch. We all know it's not a matter of if but when. The company goes bankrupt, the hardware and property sold off, banks holding the bag.

The only way out is to develop a model vastly more powerful and capable that we have now. The market believes theres a good chance of that, although I've never understood why its truly winner-take-all

Cloud models will always have massive benefits of scale.

Caching is the simplest one to understand, cloud providers often reach a 90% cache hit rate, so hosting the same request locally on the exact same model on the same hardware is often way less efficient than on the cloud where a group of users generates a healthy cache.


KV cache is per conversation, I'm getting 100% hit rate on my single tenant local set up.

The benefits of scale are on the token generation side, you can batch rounds and generate tokens for multiple conversations per pass instead of just one token per pass.


Yeah avoiding all mention of the huge financial incentives that may push for “pacing the frontier” makes it seem like the opposite of a credibility boost for these firms.

It seems damaging since most folks (who lack insider knowledge) will naturally wonder if it’s due to plateauing performance per $ or some other non “alignment” reason.


Regardless of flux, we still haven't addressed the core issue.

I heard a story recently from a friend who mingles with a lot of tech and finance people. One conversation happened after a meeting between a group which deeply bothers him to this day. The conversation basically went like this: "How will all the humans rendered obsolete by AI die?" Answers ranged form "Maybe they will die in riots" or die of starvation from food shortages, or hey, gunned down by AI drones.

I asked him "Are you sure it wasn't dark humor" - "NO! They were dead serious."

There's a cult around AI, not the users, but people with wealth and power who would be more than happy if there were less people. A lot less people.


I've heard of similar things coming from Marc Andreessen, even before the AI boom. There's some scary people in power

Edit: found the article I remembered https://prospect.org/2024/04/24/2024-04-24-my-dinner-with-an...

> I brought up the ordinary comforts of kinship, friendship, craft, memory, legend, lore, skills passed down across generations, and other benefits that small towns provide: things that make human beings human beings. I pointed out that there must be something in the kind of places he grew up in worth preserving. I dared venture that it is always worth mourning when a venerable human community passes from the Earth; that maybe people are more than just figures finding their proper price on the balance sheet of life …

> And that’s when the man in the castle with the seven fireplaces said it.

> “I’m glad there’s OxyContin and video games to keep those people quiet.”


There really does seem to be a cult of AI successionists who want the AI to kill them and the rest of humanity so that it can act with impunity.

Obviously these people are dangerous lunatics akin to Heaven’s Gate or the People’s Temple and need to be treated as such.


Yes, it's absolutely a cult. I'd even go so far as to say it's a death cult.

I don't fear genAI even a little. I am terrified and angered by genAI companies and their most hardcore supporters, though. I think they present a genuine danger to us all.


I mean half the US seems to be ran by death cults thinly disguised as religions. The fact this spills over into everything else is not surprising.

Death cults that will kill you because of AI are the same group that will instill their values into the AI to ensure it kills it all.

There was also the Micro-A which I found on some dev boards. I think the Arduino Due (Arm Cortex M3 chip) used one for the USB host port as well as an Atmel Arm uc board.

Also that weird, really small USB connector that was found on some early digital cameras. I think Kodak was a big user of it. Sorta looked like a narrower and taller version of the Mini-B. Maybe the Mini-AB but that doesn't look like it. I have one in my box at home.


Old digital cameras just used non standard usb shapes so they are almost impossible to find now.

Ah, they were proprietary then. I thought they were an early standard that lacked a 5th pin.

> Ziptie once coiled, attach label for what format / length.

Please god, no more zip ties. Use double sided Velcro strap. You can buy it in a roll and cut to length. Reuse it all you want. Join multiple shorter lengths to make a longer one. Just please don't make me cut another god damn zip tie off a bundled cord. I deal with enough zip tie bondage fetishists at work.


Cutting the ziptie is half the fun! Just be glad it's not shrink wrapped or clamshelled ;)

double-sided velcro holds less well and is more likely to stick to things. Just toss a pair of diags in your box if you are worried about getting the zip ties off.

I am talking about frivolous use of zip ties and over-application. Things like zip tying an extension cord for storage. And over application as in every 2-4 inches on cable bundles. Madness.

If what you wrote here are your own words then I would say that you write well enough to not need an LLM.

That is actually quite reassuring, thanks

Can you explain 2 a bit more? I see the Auto input levels but unsure what you mean by "move the midpoint to the median."

The result I got for the original mars image was a washed out red image with some yellow around the craters.


I interpreted that step as "once you click 'Auto Input Levels', drag the center triangle of the 3 at the bottom of the histogram to where you think the median of the histogram is". That middle slider defaults to being the midpoint of the other 2 sliders. I'm not sure if there is a smarter way to move it to the median beyond "looks about right".

I got this as a result https://i.imgur.com/RsXx3y2.jpeg and it certainly doesn't preserve the color of the rest of the image (there are probably more algorithmic steps needed for that) but it does seem to make highlight the same faint patterns much more clearly.


Thanks. I was able to get the same result as you did. Pretty neat trick.

The levels tool maps a subset of the channel range to the full range, effectively changing the brightness and contrast in one step.

The center point controls the gamma correction, so you can map a biased distribution (mostly bright or dark for example) to be more evenly distributed.

That was the purpose of that step - move the midpoint slider to about where the peak in the histogram is, to get an evenly distributed range.

The low/high slider can be moved towards that to increase the contrast.

"Contrast" here will only apply to the A/B channels, which is the color information, so it's increasing the color contrast and unbiasing it, while keeping the luminance information.

Photoshop also can do the same transform, and interactively in the LAB colorspace (no need to combine/uncombine the channels first).


Thanks for the details but I realized I should have said "Pretend I just installed GIMP and my knowledge of image editing is MS paint."

This is what I was after: "move the midpoint slider to about where the peak in the histogram is, to get an evenly distributed range."

It kinda worked! Thank you and sorry for making you explain the gory details though they are appreciated and useful.


> I really hope the Chinese keep killing everything that gets too big to fail.

Be careful what you wish for. What happens when China gets too big to fail?


Perhaps the world gets a new hegemon that isn't going to spend the next century bombing other countries, installing dictatorships and destroying democracies? Doesn't sound too bad!

> destroying democracies?

Taiwan would like a word.


I'm not saying China is perfect, but its not unreasonable to entertain the possibility that it might be better than what we've suffered for the last century.

Okay, Taiwan. They are the losing side from the Chinese civil war from over half a century ago and proclaim themselves as the true Chinese government. I'm not saying China has the right to crush them, but the tension is at least understandable.

A comparison with the democracies and lives destroyed by US FP is ridiculous. If Taiwan would like a word with China, well, half the world would like a word with the US.


Presently Xi is focused on growing China and doing a great job of it. But what happens when Xi is gone? Once China reaches its goal and is the worlds manufacturing source, how will it use its influence to obtain resources?

We already see China deploying debt traps and surveillance technology to developing nations. They are building surveillance states which feed back into China. With that, I feel that we have yet to see how China is going to exert its power.


they don't have to answer for the next quarter, and that's good enough for me.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: