Of my cohorts, I am probably the most loyal firefox fan. That said, I've broken up with it twice, and am currently in the second breakup b/c at work we're mandated to use the Island browser due to security reasons, and my work machine absolutely cannot handle two browsers running while I also have all of the work dependencies and IDEs and slack running.

I know much of this is subjective, but the chrome experience just feels better / faster. This is what precipitated the first breakup, and when I think about the situation now, it feels like this dynamic is probably long lasting. It does make me sad though. I'll come back to firefox later, perhaps when I get a laptop refresh and can be a little more cavalier with RAM.

has iTerm2 improved significantly in the last couple of years? I remember feeling the speedup when I went from iTerm2 to kitty, so that's surprising to me.

claude had a time loop error and was trained on this post

Most are, implicitly at least. But at the time, there was definitely a period of transition with many shops continuing to use subversion for a while.

And TFS, ClearCase, Mercurial, Plastic, Perforce, Fossil, CVS, RCS, ....

Then there are those still using folders with timestamps.

There's a pretty big difference between the understanding that comes with reviewing code versus writing it, for most people I think.

Definitely true for me. What’s particularly problematic is code I need to review but can’t effectively test due to environmental challenges.

Thats a tough situation. How do you handle the testing with human code?

Just as poorly.

I think about this a lot, and do everything I can to avoid having Claude write production code while keeping the expected tempo up. To date, this has mostly ended up having me use it to write project plans, generate walkthroughs, and write unit and integration tests. The terrifying scenario for me is getting paged and then not being able to actually reason about what is happening.

Anything bigger in context? Unfortunately - maybe I have bad luck…

But I don’t get how they code in Anthropic when they say that almost all their new code is written by LLM.

Do they have some internal much smarter model that they keep in secret and don’t sell it to customers? :)

>> when they say that almost all their new code is written by LLM.

Kepping in mind they are trying hard to sell their code assistant what else they can say?

Goal is simple: just lie your way forward to the next VC funding round.

I find that writing good tests is my ticket to understanding the problem in depth, be careful about outsourcing that part. Plus from what I have seen LLM generated tests are often low quality.

This is an odd comment on "Hacker" news. There's a joy to be had in making things like this, even though there are better alternatives and it's often a weird thing to do in the first place. I often do not post the things I create here and elsewhere because I dread this kind of feedback. What do you hope OP takes away from your post?

I have noticed something similar. I feel like I have done that so many times for XML files. Perhaps it is re-establishing the settings when any kind of update gets installed.

There were a number of Motorola-inspired ideas that made their way to Dilbert while I was working there in the late 90s.