Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | danillonunes's commentslogin

Some old twitter users still have animated gif avatars that stop being supported years ago. Maybe their approach is to just stop supporting it for new avatars and grandfathering whoever manage to upload one before.

Someone could make a site that just computes the difference between hacker news and unslop news.

Reminds me the days people would write Micro$oft (usually in Linux vs Windows discourse).

It's funny to think that back in the days we used to think the most evil thing a company could do was charging money for their software. Today we even praise some companies because they are "less evil" and they actually charge money, instead of giving the service for free and mining our data (e.g. Fast Mail vs Gmail; or Kagi vs Google).


> It's funny to think that back in the days we used to think the most evil thing a company could do was charging money for their software.

They did a lot more than that.


> I decided to download Moviemake and buy the Digital Plus pack r so I went to Microsoft.com

That "r" from "Moviemaker" pushed to the end of "and buy the Digital Plus pack" displays the universally shared experience of writing something, then deciding to come back to add something else and fucking up the first sentence.

I've been there too, Bill.


And Twitter used to have free API access. And Facebook Messenger used to have Jabber compatibility. I don't think those companies deserve any trust in regards of promoting them for their open initiatives.

Threads' activity pub gimmick is just a nice to have. It's the salad of the Big Mac. If you're going to eat it anyway, sure, glad it is there, but it doesn't make it deserve a spot in any serious discussion about healthy food alternatives.


Didn't worked so well for the Pokémon show.


Pokemon is the most valuable franchise IP on the planet. Maybe it did work well.


It's more like a cultural expectation that business do shady things and the "clown makeup" is a compromise that government found between making those shady things illegal (utopia) and don't intervene at all and let the corporations set their rules (dystopia).

It's like those warnings in cigarettes packages saying they will kill you. I know cigarettes are bad, but the warnings also make me believe there's at least "some" control in how bad they are. Now if I buy one without the warnings, I will worry those in particular are extra-shady and likely to kill me even faster.


>warnings in cigarettes packages

Oh how I miss those warnings. Nowadays the packages are covered in graphic body horror pictures. And there's no branding on them any more, just white text on a black background, so I have to carefully check that the illiterate teenagers at the store gives me the correct ones.

Do anyone else hear circus music?


I think the point is to make you stop smoking, without actually making it illegal to smoke. Have you considered stopping smoking?


Well, if you own an online casino, I guess your moral compass is already so skewed that you simple don't care. On the other hand, if you own an online mom & pop store that sells clothes for puppies, you rationalize that the impact of those manipulations is not that big of a deal. You're not ruining anyone's live by the single act of persuading them to purchase $100 worth of apparel for mr. pancake.


The ultimate image compression algorithm: The txt


Can't they mimic the structure of legit content to get passed on the whitelist?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: