Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | ignoramous's commentslogin

LLM copyedits such as these aren't my idea of clear.

> GLM 5.3 Flash gets a job done well, etc. – but when I add cost of M-token in the ROI math, Jeez! MiMo is an order of magnitude better.

API may be expensive, but I do 900m tokens (95% cached, ~0.4% output) on Z.ai's $18/mo coding plan with GLM 5.3 Flash.


I wouldn't call that inexpensive.

For comparison, I am currently at 6.6B tokens, 95% of monthly quota on a 10$ command code plan, mostly using DeepSeek flash 4.1, or some of the free models for easier tasks.


What's a command code plan?


> We already had enough proof of vulnerabilities in the OS code and Manufacturers (eg. Samsung/Lenovo/etc privileged apps)

Vulnerabilities aren't intentional.

> reviewed apps that were used for fraud or access as bad actors

The App Developer Verification program, Android Advanced Protection Mode, and Play Protect are all systems put in place in response to "bad actors".


Uncanny how any coding model I use will employ the word "gate".

Probably because I've had Quality Gates in my pipelines for so long :)


> had not heard of anyone actually using a spinlock in production code

Go stdlib sync.Mutex uses spins: https://victoriametrics.com/blog/go-sync-mutex / https://archive.vn/BIb7F


Optimistically spinning for a bit before falling back to futex or equivalent is very different from a spinlock.

> always instinctively followed the generosity path

> experienced that when customers are delighted and that when frictions are removed

Charlie Munger:

  When other companies find ways to save money, they turn it into profit. [Costco] passes it on to customers. It’s almost a religious duty. [They] sacrifice short-term profits for long-term success”.
> not always been able to convince others

Many different ways to conduct business. "Lean Enterprise" might be in line with your thinking: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lean_enterprise

> talking people out of trying to prematurely squeeze out every last penny?

I'd say this is a wrong framing. It isn't the people; it is the systems & environs they are in, the incentives they operate under.

Economists have a term they call "willingness-to-pay", using which some business might optimize for "consumer surplus" (low price), some for "producer surplus" (high margin).

See also, The Economics of Customer Businesses, Michael Mauboussin et al, https://www.eatonvance.com/insights/consilient-observer/the-... (2021).

Or Bezos' "Create more than you consume": https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/company-news/2020-letter-to...



Thank you for these references, I really appreciate it.

You should read the essay. It is mostly about pivoting towards an outsized outcomes for founders & leveraging various avenues available to their advantage.

I don't mean less powerful relative to startup founders, I mean less powerful in terms of how we allocate resources in the economy.

Why would that be a good idea?

Greed has been clearly very efficient at allocating resources and money is the first resource of any business endeavour.

Politics and courts should frames and boundaries around that greed's reach, otherwise just let it alone.


Greed has also been very inefficient at holding companies accountable in regards to external costs.

What actually happens is that economic power don't stop at those boundaries but instead buy politics and courts

Because when investors allocate resources based on the ability of those resources to generate a profitable return you end up with an increasing volume of resources being used in the service of fulfilling the needs of a decreasing number of people.

Investors are, by definition, the people who control resource allocation in a capitalist economy. Making investors less powerful is the same thing as making the economy less capitalist, which is obviously bad.

I have a similar calibration workflow, too [0]; but I am under no illusion that my personal benchmarks remain secret.

Once we send code & prompts to the providers, it can no longer be considered private.

[0] And came to the same conclusion as you did: Claudes were better but not by much: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48654635


Grey? There's multiple conferences that "ethically sourced" proxy providers feature at now (ex: extractsummit.io)

Web scraping (for LLM inference / training) I guess has transformed "residential proxies" into a giant industry.


"ethically sourced" means someone clicked "agree" on their LG TV terms of service, as opposed to having a virus on their computer

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: