Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | search_facility's commentslogin

Well said!


Great, this is unique trait and helpful one - Firefox is here to stay


This "hidden knowledge" is fun to read but pain to remember and use, especially when working with multi-platform environments //

Switched from bash to plain python scripts for shell stuff everywhere several years ago, and never looked back into bash zoo anymore. Stable syntax across Win/Mac/Linux, no bash/zsh/msys2 obscure differences, normal errors and Clause writes scaffolds quick and flawless anyway


I guess if you're never calling out to any third-party python libraries, that can work.

I'd never call Python "portable" though if you have outside dependencies.


I find Python a terrible bash replacement.

Calling all the command line tools is cumbersome, the Python cloud APIs are verbose compared to the cli tools and often have very different concepts for how they interact with services.

But I agree that there is a need for a better bash and zsh is nice but not the upgrade that is needed


... Today its "Claude just needs to write it" and the "hard part" is the prompt :)


Current situation exist presisely due researches of 20th century though. This is largely connected things


There are still problems though - in Chrome translation addon simply no way to login properly so its broken //


Also represents good test coverage


It's almost a HN meme at this point (and you might be referencing it ;-)). But for anyone unaware, SQLite's test coverage is _outstanding_ and well worth reading about[0].

[0] https://www.sqlite.org/testing.html


It's the opposite, engineers do know. Claiming otherwise is way too generous and over confident.

I mean between this two "knowings" the Claude inner workings are much more clear for engineers, including many side effects, alternatives, custom shortcuts in processing etc. It's a magic only for people looking at it as black box


How would engineers know? We don't even know what makes humans conscious


Well, at the very least we have a base to distinct different kinds then.

Probably the main problem of people implying LLM consciousness is that they imply LLM have human-kind of consciousness. Judging only on "how they speak", generally, they insist on using the same word that labels human consciousness (exclusively), etc.

But there are so many instrinic differences that such claim is not feasible despite similar "talking abilities".


It is useful, so yes


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: