I hate your company. You posted my homework and assignments online without my permissions by paying off TAs in my university. That was theft.

I was wondering how they get hold of content. That is a pretty shady thing to do.

FYI: The title is a sarcastic take on OpenAI's codex lack of nuance, not that the XY problem has been solved.

timeful! God the app had such a good interface for managing your day. Why did Google have to buy and shut it down!!!!

Look up tretinoin it reverses aging to some degree.

It was a much needed break. I was burnt out working at Qualcomm during the first two years of my career, and to be honest I don't think I was a good fit for my team as I lacked understanding of hardware. I took a three month break to interview with startups and big-tech companies, got an offer from Amazon for 44% more pay and travelled to Turkey. I am returning to work in two weeks with a fresh mind.

Maybe I will start my own entrepreneurial journey in my late-20's but for now I am young.

Since reading code is significantly harder than writing code, I hope OpenAI's model allows users to infer a natural language explanation of a given snippet of code. This should be possible if it is a generative model.

Basic Number Theory with the purpose of understanding modern cryptographic systems.

I don't think that's the right metric for assessing feasibility. Humans can do more than one thing at the same time.

At one carrot per second, you can't provide food for the entire human demand.

But we don't plant one carrot per second.

That sounds more doable than current legislation that would cost more money than exist in the entire world.

Location: Toronto, ON, Canada Remote: NO Willing to relocate: Only to cities in Canada. Technologies: Python, Deep Learning, numpy, scipy, pandas, C,C++, embedded C. Résumé/CV: https://bit.ly/2Vi3Oy4 Email: rafizsooham+HNjobs@gmail.com

I have prior experience with deep learning, accelerating deep neural architectures and statistics. I will graduate with my bachelors degree in May 2019.

I think the meetup protocol with this app is getting it wrong by asking women to initiate. Men tend to initiate despite the rejection of interest; most women are not as forward and find it attractive that the man approach them. Why would the app depend on women to initiate?

Think about if it was reversed. You're somewhere and there's a list of single women... Every woman there would be swarmed upon, which is a situation they already have. (Open an account on any dating app as a woman with no image, or bio, you'll still get plenty of messages/matches) The example is a good case, they might not even initiate, just stand in viewing distance of a single guy they like.

Women filter their choices more than men. Bumble works for a good chunk of women who will initiate once filtered to something they're vaguely interested in. The number of conversations initiated by women on tinder must be close to 1%, if that.