I've used plenty of dynamic languages before, but I don't see how that would help in this case.
The point is that I wanted statically typed records, which a dynamic language won't give me. Java has added syntax for defining records now, which is great, but I'm not (yet) able to use the latest version.
> makes your object’s serialization capabilities a dice roll
The point is that I wanted statically typed records, which a dynamic language won't give me. Java has added syntax for defining records now, which is great, but I'm not (yet) able to use the latest version.
> makes your object’s serialization capabilities a dice roll
Not sure how? The effect of @Value is documented.