Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There are reasons to believe that some candidates aren't even non quantum desktop computer resistant:

https://mathematical-research-institute.sydney.edu.au/news/q...

https://www.securityweek.com/nist-post-quantum-algorithm-fin...

( Disclaimer: I worked on pre 1991 Cayley, born again post 1991 as Magma )



This is the reason for my sarcastic response above. Attempts at making compact PQC are being broken left and right. If anything the line of battle is moving towards larger, more costly schemes at the moment. Complaining about proof size or validation speed right now is like pissing into the wind. You’re lucky if your PQC finalist scheme is even secure against a 2010 Mac mini in a year or two. Complaining that its proofs don’t fit into a MTU packet? That’s rich.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: