Unfortunately I'm not sure this will affect those at all...it's specifically for "realistic" AI use according to all the quotes. I'm not sure narration or illustration/slides generated by AI would be covered at all in that case.

Anything more competent than Microsoft Sam counts as realistic in my book. If their definition excludes narration that would be weird.

Their detection might not look at audio right now though.

I suppose, but I guess the quality of voice narration I've heard is still closer to "realistic robot" than anything.

The flaws can be pretty subtle sometimes. I don't want any subtlety. If I'm not hit in the face with a brick over how mechanical it is, put a disclaimer.

When a segment is about a place or thing with a particular name and the pronunciation completely shifts from one to the next it’s a big annoyance.