Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
wbharding
on Nov 27, 2013
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
Rails 3.2 Performance: Another Step Slower
We didn't change our Ruby version. We changed as little as possible overall to make the comparison "apples-to-apples."
Getting a performance
increase
during an upgrade would be a highly welcomed change in our world.
krisdol
on Nov 27, 2013
[–]
I'm not suggesting that you upgrade to 2.0, or anything drastic, but does this mean you don't install the security updates? Build 448 included important OpenSSL fixes, and no functional changes or deprecations occur during these minor upgrades.
kawsper
on Nov 27, 2013
|
parent
[–]
You should upgrade to build 484 because of this:
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2013/11/22/heap-overflow-i...
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
Getting a performance increase during an upgrade would be a highly welcomed change in our world.