Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> And what happens when it decreases the number of people who choose to get an education to seek greater opportunities?

Why would it do that?

> After all, the thought of perpetual poverty is a huge motivator.

The threat of absolute poverty may have some marginal value as a motivator, but what it motivates is largely risk-averse behavior to maintain the status quo from those at risk of poverty but not currently in it. At the same time, the reality of poverty often means, regardless of motivation, the absence of the means to many things, regardless of motivation.

> With that gone? Won't we see a higher divide between skilled and unskilled, rich and poor?

No, if we are funding a basic income guarantee from progressive income taxation, we won't see a greater divide between the rich and the poor, in any case. We might (though I don't see any reason to believe this is particularly likely) see a greater gap in skills between the "skilled" and the "unskilled" by some measures, but as this gap won't produce as large of a gap as currently between the opportunities and choices available to the next generation offspring of the "skilled" and "unskilled", that will simply reflect a greater realization of human freedom.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: