We're doing this now one way or another, I mean in terms of dollars spent.
The problem is, its 14+ different programs doing it - if we make ONE program, we've just cut how many administrators and bureaucrats out of the loop saving however many dollars in overhead - plus all sorts of different infrastructure systems to administer and pay it all.
It's logical common sense this program would work more cheaply (and possibly better) just thru overhead savings. Means tested welfare is wasteful.
The problem is, its 14+ different programs doing it - if we make ONE program, we've just cut how many administrators and bureaucrats out of the loop saving however many dollars in overhead - plus all sorts of different infrastructure systems to administer and pay it all.
It's logical common sense this program would work more cheaply (and possibly better) just thru overhead savings. Means tested welfare is wasteful.