I find that this is pretty different from how I prompt. I feel like AI use for greenfield projects is different from long-established codebases.

Have you tried `pi`? What do you think of it?

I actually disagree, I think the problem is that heavy-handed companies have been dictating choices to us and our children, in contradiction to existing laws, and people are finally saying enough, these companies need to follow the laws.

I mean, that is the nature of marriage. You both shoulder burdens for each other

I don't follow that "Most Qualified" would mean 95% of jobs going to foreigners. I get that the U.S. is 4-5% of the world's population, but if I live in San Antonio, Texas, the pool of plumbers for my house must also live in San Antonio, Texas, meaning that 99.9+% of the world is not remotely qualified for the job.

I mean, this debate is about immigration, right? So current location doesn't super matter, assuming you can amortize the cost of relocating a plumber across several years' worth of plumbing work.

I think the weekend could cover the beginning and the end, just like a bookend can be at the beginning or end of the book shelf

My shelves all have two bookends. If they only had one, the books would fall off the end without a bookend.

But, this is simply mataphorical reasoning. One cannot conflate weeks with bookshelves for many reasons.

It's creepy

COVID was accidentally released from a lab.

That statement was censored as "objectively false", but our best information says it's probably true, and it was probably true then, too. Censorship is a dangerous walk. I totally agree with you that harmful misinformation is a problem, and that we have a duty of care. The problem is "who fact-checks the fact checkers?", and what happens when political leaders can request certain topics "fact checked".

Do you have children? Because I've never heard a parent think that way

I think it's a little brash, but I do think that if we could accurately measure "care" that people with 1 child care statistically slightly more for them than those with 5 might care about any individual one. Not that they don't care, but that the one with 1 would worry more. Like how families with 1 daughter and multiple boys might dot on the only daughter a bit more.

I mean historically this is exactly how it worked. When infant mortality was 25-50%, people often had 10 children or so. Maybe 5 would make it to be adults, but people back then didn't view death like we view it now. Sure, they mourned, but losing a child was not a "stop the world" event, because you could expect to lose many. So, it couldn't be.

That was a little over 100 years go. So, a long time, but not that long.

This is exactly what I was wondering, thank you! They kept saying 11 states already have this, but I couldn't figure out which 11.